Reporting Format for Nanotechnology Related Information in CMC Review

Recently, the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER)  Office of Pharmaceutical Science issued the above entitled addition to CDER's Manual of Policies and Procedures(MAPP). This produced some uproar in the nanotech community by some who interpreted a single line as indicating that the FDA was about to start redefining nanomaterials.

The purpose of this new MAPP is to provide "chemistry, manufacturing, and controls (CMC) reviewers within the Office of Pharmaceutical Sciences (OPS) with the framework by which relevant information about nanomaterial- containing drugs will now be captured in CMC reviews of current and future CDER drug application submissions. This information will be used to develop policy regarding these products."

In its background section, the MAPP notes that "because development of nanotechnology based drugs is still in its infancy, there are no established standards for the study or regulatory evaluation of these products."  (Emphasis added). The MAPP then goes on to define nanomaterials/nanoscale materials as "any materials with at least one dimension smaller than 1,000 nm".

What is important to note here is the language contained in a footnote: "The definations described in this section apply only to this MAPP". (Emphasis added). This defination, in short, doesnot apply outside of the manual. While the accepted defination of nanomaterials is that of any material at smaller than 100 nm, there is currently no legal defining of nanomaterials. Title I Section 102 of H.R. 5116,  The America COMPETES Reauthorization Act of 2010 would define "nanoscale" as meaning "one or more dimensions of between approximately 1 and 100 nanometers".  HR 5116, discussed here earlier, has passed the House and awaits action in the Senate.

The remainder of the MAPP consists of informing OPS CMC reviewers of their responsibility for "correctly documenting nanotechnology related information in their reviews" and for presenting this information, which will cover such items as what nanomaterials are present in the drug, does the nanomaterial dissolve in water, etc,  in tabular form, which will be used later to populate the aforementioned database.

As as been noted here and in a variety of medical and science journals, nanotechnology's most immediate impact may be in the medical field, particularly in the treatment of cancer. The use of nanomaterials in medications and therapy is the latest development in the medical world and is fraught with controversy. By creating the database described in this MAPP, the FDA would be taking a first step towards fulfilling it's regulatory duty to the American public, by gathering information on which it can base later decisions and policies.

The Nanotech Regulatory Document Archive

The Center for the Study of Law, Science & Technology, part of the Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law at Arizona State University,  Monash University Law School, and the Institute of Environmental and Energy Law jointly created the Nanotech Regulatory Document Archive in 2009. The archive is a free and easily searchable database of, as the name implies, documents regarding the regulation of nanotechnology, nanomaterials and nanoindustry produced by national and state governments, government agencies, and others throughout the world. Users are supposed to create an account in order to access the documents, which are in PDF formats, however the documents seem to be accessible even without setting up an account. Users may also add documents to the archives collection, which does require registering and setting up an account. Documents can either be accessed via the "Recent Documents" tab at the top of the page, by clicking on one of the countries listed on the left hand side of the page or via the search box

The database will prove useful for various groups, ranging from the general public who are just curious to business people in the nanoindustrial field who want to see what the rules and regulations are in other countries to elected representatives ( or more likely their staffs who would need to do the research in the area) who, inevitably, will be engaged in debates over the writing and enforcement of laws and regulations. Corporate Counsels  for nanotech companies and outside counsels may also find it a useful place to do research for their clients who are thinking of expanding into other countries and need to see what regulations are already in place.

The database was funded by a multi-year grant from the US Department of Energy. Due to its relatively recent establishment, there are a limited number of documents available, but I suspect that as word of it gets around and more people realize its usefulness, the database will grow.

Nano EHS Database

The International Council on Nanotechnology (ICON) just released its newest project/tool, the Nano-EHS Database Analysis Tool.  To quote ICON, "This web tool allows you to obtain a quick and thorough synopsis of our Environment, Health and Safety Database using two types of analysis. The first is a Simple Distribution Analysis (pie chart) which compares categories within a specified time range. The second type is a Time Progressive Distribution Analysis (histogram) which compares categories over a specified overall time range and data grouping period."  The report will generate data in pdf or xls format as well as a report on available publications based on search categories, such as material studied, target receptors, and type of publication.

While the Tool only tracks ICON's database, it will likely become a valuable resource for literature searches.  With the increased importance of regulatory schemes such as TSCA registrations, literature reviews will become more critical, even to smaller operations.  ICON's Tool will assist those entities, and others seeking wide ranging topics addressing nanotechnology or nanomaterials.