White House Issues Broad Statement Regarding Nano-EHS Principles

On November 8, 2007, the Executive Office of the President issued a memorandum entitled "Principles of Nanotechnology Environmental, Health, and Safety Oversight." The memorandum was co-signed by the President's Council on Environmental Quality and Office of Science and Technology Policy, and was directed to EPA, FDA, OSHA, NIOSH, and other federal agencies conducting nanotechnology research and development.

In keeping with prior Administration statements, the memorandum takes the position that "existing statutory authorities are adequate to address oversight of nanotechnology and its applications." The document suggests new regulatory approaches may be developed as new scientific information becomes available. In the meantime, the federal government "should use standard oversight approaches," and "should strive to reach an appropriate level of consistency . . . across the government."

The memorandum also suggests adequate nano related EHS information should be developed, "to the extent practicable and protecting confidential information," and the federal government should "proactively promote international cooperation" on EHS research.

Unsurprisingly, Risk Policy Report, Nov. 20, 2007, Vol. 14, No. 47, reports that "[w]hile industry sources were generally pleased with the language in the memo, environmentalists and think tank officials were widely opposed to the memo, saying that current statutes are in adequate for the unique aspects of nanomaterials and that standard risk assessment practices will not suffice."

Tags:

ATSDR Proposes Developing Toxicological Profile for "Nanomaterials"

Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, each year the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry's Division of Toxicology (ATSDR) at the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) publishes in the federal register a list of priority substances for which it may create new toxicological profiles.  This year's list contains 73 proposed substances, one of which is "nanomaterials."  The generic use of the term "nanomaterials" without reference to any particular nanoscale material is unusual and most likely unworkable.  We've asked ASTDR how "nanomaterials" ended up on the list and exactly what it means in this context.  Stay tuned.

Tags:

The Nanotech Report, 5th Edition

If there was any left who actually wondered if this "nanotech" thing was just a passing fad, check out Lux Research's newest release: The Nanotech Report, 5th Edition.  In this report, comprising 500+ pages over two volumes, Lux provides an overview of the status of nanotechnology as an industry. Continue Reading...

New Radio Program to Highlight Nanotechnology

Beginning on December 2, 2007, 1310 KXAM in Phoenix, Arizona, will begin airing the Bourne Report each Sunday afternoon from 3 - 4 p.m. The radio show will explore emerging technologies, including nanotechnology, and will be hosted by Marlene Bourne. For those of us living outside the Phoenix area, the show will also be streamed live on www.bournereport.com and archived for podcast.
Tags:

Samsung SilverCare Washing Machine

For readers following the Samsung washing machine controversy, marketing of Samsung's Silver Nano washing machine was curtailed for a while last year in the US after EPA indicated it intended to regulate silver ion generators as pesticides under FIFRA.  EPA officially announced its position on silver ion generators in the September 21, 2007 federal register.  Samsung is now marketing a SilverCare washing machine with antimicrobial properties in the United States.  No word on whether the new machines use silver nanoparticles (doubtful). Stay tuned.
Tags:

ES&T On Nanotechnology Safety

Environmental Science & Technology recently released an editorial discussing nanotechnology safety issues and, more importantly, the recent debate over whether EPA should regulate nanoscale materials as new chemicals under TSCA.  The editorial succinctly sets forth EPA's position, as expressed by Jim Willis, EPA's Chemical Control Division Director, on the TSCA issue this way: 

In an EPA document, TSCA Inventory Status of Nanoscale Substances—General Approach, released on July 12, the agency explained why it could not group all nanomaterials as new substances solely on the basis of size. This is because the definition of a new chemical under TSCA is based on only molecular structure or identity. If a nanomaterial contains the same molecules as a chemical already in the TSCA inventory, it is an existing chemical, says Willis. And almost all nanomaterials being researched and manufactured today are chemically identical to existing chemicals in the TSCA inventory. Thus, EPA has no authority to regulate them. Carbon nanotubes and fullerenes, for example, are made of carbon, an existing chemical in the inventory.

h/t to TGDaily.com.

 

Recap: US Chamber Nanotech Conference

By Helen Kim:

On November 13, 2007, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce hosted “Breaking the Barriers: The BIG Business of Nanotechnology” at 1615 H Street NW in Washington, D.C. The conference focused on issues of commercialization, regulatory concerns, and consumer education for the emerging field of nanotechnology. Events included speeches by Senator Ron Wyden; Dean Ronald McNeil of the business school at the University of Illinois-Springfield; John Marburger, science advisor to President Bush; and two roundtable discussions composed of educators, investors, researchers, and government officials.

Continue Reading...

NorTech Announces Innovation Award Winners

NorTech just announced the winners of its 2007 Innovation Award at its Summit in Westlake, Ohio.  Crain's Cleveland has the story here.  Among the winners was one local nanotechnology company, NanoMimetics, Inc., which according to Crain's develops and commercializes nanocoatings for medical and industrial applications.  Congratulations to all!

Andrew Maynard Testifies Before House Committee

Andrew Maynard of the Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies at the Woodrow Wilson Institute testified on October 31st before the House Science Committee.  PEN's press release is here and the full text of Maynard's remarks are here.  In his testimony, Maynard advocated six steps to improve nanotechnology safety and criticized what he believed was a lack of coordination and focus on environmental, health & safety issues. 

 

Continue Reading...

More Nano Silver in the Water?

A new product is hitting the market, the SILVER SEAL(TM) Antibacterial, Washable Keyboard and Mouse by Seal Shield Corporation.  What is unique about these products is that in addition to the nano silver ions embedded directly into the plastic for anti-bacterial impacts, the products are completely dishwasher safe. Continue Reading...

U.S. Chamber Enters Debate

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce is the latest organization to wade into the nanotechnology pool and host a forum to discuss issues of concern to members.  With apologies for the late notice, the Chamber will host the symposium Breaking the Barriers: The BIG Business of Nanotechnology today (November 13, 2007) at its Headquarters to discuss "the major barriers of nanotechnology commercialization" as well as regulatory concerns and consumer education.  The Chamber is located at  1615 H Street NW in Washington, D.C., and a live webcast can be found here.

Nanotechnology Law Report -- October 2007

Nanotechnology Law Report -- October 2007

Tags:

Cambridge Takes a Hard Look at Nanotechnology

By John C. Monica, Jr. and Igor Linkov

Cambridge is well known for its top research universities and cutting edge biotech businesses. The City is also well known for its proactive approach to regulatory and public health issues. Cambridge’s City Council recently asked its City Manager to evaluate whether the City needs a new ordinance aimed at any potential environmental, health, and safety concerns arising from the manufacture or use of engineered nanoscale materials within city limits.  The Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars has identified about a dozen businesses located in Cambridge that manufacture or use nanoscale materials in their operations.  At the same time, potential nano-related EHS concerns have made news headlines over the past couple of years.  The City Council was concerned about scientific reports that certain nanoscale materials may have toxic effects in some laboratory settings.  While the jury is still out on whether the use of nanoscale materials actually poses an increased risk to human health or the environment in everyday settings, the City Council wanted to address the issue in a forward thinking manner.

To this end, the City Manager asked Cambridge's Director of Environmental Health to analyze the issue and provide a recommended course of action.  The Director has convened a six-month advisory panel comprised of Cambridge citizens, University experts, private consulting firms, lawyers, industry representatives, and non-governmental organizations to help him provide the City Manager with a list of well-reasoned options concerning whether the City actually needs a new ordinance, and if so, what it should look like.  The seventeen member advisory panel will hear experts speak on a range of issues including the state of scientific studies on nano-related EHS issues, how existing federal and state laws may or may not be sufficient to address these concerns, and how any potential new ordinance may adversely affect fledgling nano-businesses within the community.  The Director of Environmental Health with the panel will then use the information to craft a set of recommendations for the City Manager to review, modify, and possibly present to the City Council.

The City faces a tough task.  The field of nanotechnology evolves very quickly and new products and materials are being continuously added to commerce and research.  Properties of nanomaterials are highly variable and the scale of potential health impacts associated with their use is uncertain.  Many federal and state governments have sponsored research projects to develop information pertinent to risk assessment and nanomaterials governance.  No consensus has developed.

The advisory panel has already met three times, and the entire process is currently scheduled to wrap up in January or February 2008.  The panel has a lot of ground to cover in a relatively short period of time.  The City appears determined to develop an ordinance based on scientifically rigorous standards that is also practical and acceptable to local stakeholders and the business community.  Based on its first three meetings, the panel seems well aware of its responsibility to balance the uncertainty of whether certain nanoscale materials may pose EHS risks against the certainty that needless over regulation may stifle business development.

Tags:

Nanotechnology-Enhanced Upholstery In Chrysler Vehicles

Popular Mechanics is reporting that Chrysler is utilizing YES Essentials fabric in its new vehicles.  The fabric utilizes titanium dioxide nanoparticles to repel odor and stains:

The newest version of YES Essentials fabric has an innovative technology that basically rids odors and volatile chemicals from the interior. The fabric has a nano-sized photocatylist (titanium dioxide) that transforms odors, smoke and harmful chemicals into micro-sized CO2 and H2O particles. And, no, the amount of CO2 that the seats release are not harmful to the environment, the manufacturer says.

I remember a number of audience members at our Nano App Summit environmental, health and safety panel greatly enjoyed Jerry Bahlmann's hypothetical example of coffee barista uniforms with stain-resistant properties.  Who knew one of the first implementations of that technology would be in car seats?

 

Tags: